Compliance Board

Risk Drivers & Scenarios

Simulating counterfactual credit feature interventions and testing policy recalibrations against QGI Level 5 governance ceilings.

πŸ“¦ Cohort: Monthly Batch 1 N = 350 loans
Evaluated: Sep 16, 2026 19:27
Active Invariant Score (MFI) ELEVATED RISK
0.68
Four-Fifths Reference Benchmark: ≥ 0.80
Observed Maximum Risk Score
0.3170
QGI Governance Ceiling: ≤ 0.2500
Primary Driver Identified
Paydex Commercial Score
Underwriting weight contribution: 67%

Matched-Pair Counterfactual Sensitivity Analysis

Simulating the marginal effect on predicted default probability (PD) when toggling demographic indicators under identical financial fundamentals.

SHAP • COUNTERFACTUAL
Baseline MWBE Application (Xobserved)
11.3%

Observed Average Default Probability for MWBE (Paydex ≈ 67.5, DSCR ≈ 1.36)

Synthetic Counterfactual Twin (X'counterfactual)
9.5%

Predicted Default Probability for Control Cohort under matched credit profile

Investigation Signal:
A 1.8% disparity gap exists between identical financial profiles upon toggling the protected cohort indicator, driven by upstream credit rating models and regional branch distributions.

Interactive Policy Intervention & Recalibration Sandbox

Test feature weighting interventions and evaluate projected post-remediation invariant compliance live.

WHAT-IF SIMULATION
βš™οΈ Policy Intervention Controls
πŸ“ˆ Projected Post-Remediation Posture
Simulated Invariant:
0.84
Previous: 0.68
Simulated Max Risk:
0.1600
Ceiling: ≤ 0.2500
Supervisory Projected Outcome:
βœ“ Fully restores portfolio within QGI Level 5 and Law 25 invariant boundaries.